Thursday, December 8, 2016

Sunday, November 27, 2016

REVOLUTION?

World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow." 

Donald Trump Victory Averts World War III, But Starts American Revolution
 ““Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”  “A Republic, if you can keep it.””
 This response is attributed to the American Founding Father Benjamin Franklin—who at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787,  who when queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation as to what the United States was—in the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland’s delegates to the Convention.
Special Report from Sister Ciara
Just last month I wrote to you warning that Donald Trump was racing World War III to the finish line—and with now victorious President-elect Donald Trump crossing the finish line, President Putin’s top advisor Sergei Glaziev was able to proclaim yesterday: “Americans had two choices: World War III or multilateral peace. Clinton was a symbol of war, and Trump has a chance to change this course.
Not only did President-elect Trump win, he did so with a landslide victory—which under United States Constitution is determined by the Electoral Collage, not the popular vote. 
A landslide victory, you should note, is one in which a challenger utterly and completely destroys all of his/her opponents—which Trump did by not only defeating the Clinton Crime Family and Bush Crime Family, he, also, in the process destroyed the leftist Democratic Party and the rightist Republican Party too. 
Also last month, I not only told you that Trump would win by a landslide, but so did my Dear Sisters and our valiant webmaster Brian—with the Sorcha Faal herself writing directly to you the very morning of the election to tell you of this landslide victory too, and her explaining how the so called “polls” were not predictors of anything, they were just manipulators. 
Now as all of you well know, the American and European mainstream propaganda media have spent the past couple of days gnashing their teeth and crying their eyes out as to how they could have been so wrong with their telling you that Hillary Clinton was absolutely and positively going to win—which their failure of doing so can be summed in these words: “They lied to you!”.
We, on the other hand, did what anyone’s supposed to do when entrusted with the solemn duty of providing information—we told you the truth.
Truth is that which is true or in accordance with fact or reality, and that is honestly easier to tell someone about then lying is—but in this bizarre world we all now live in we’ve been castigated for, while the lying media is still being held in high regard. 
The often attributed George Orwell quote (but whose actual origin is unknown) that says “in times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act” makes us revolutionaries for having told you what is real, and by extension, just by your reading this makes you revolutionaries too. 
And with us all being revolutionaries then, you should know which side your on if you’re a supporter of the truth—which in this historical period is the counter-coup supporting President-elect Donald Trump launched against the Western elites by various elements within the US military and intelligence agencies, and openly reported, and explained, by former CIA officer and American diplomat Dr. Steve Pieczenik.
For over a decade we’ve warned you about this, and year by year, we’ve educated you as to the reasons this is happening so you could be prepared for what’s to come—while at the same time enduring one of the most vicious series of attacks ever launched against any entity designed to destroy and repudiate—all with very little success, however, because even though we’ve only had the truth to defend us, our Lord has promised all of us it’s enough.
But be warned though!  Take a look at this map that shows in red the supporters of President-elect Donald Trump:


Now let me tell you the critical significance of what you’re seeing—within every single bit of red you see on this map, lies the largest army the world has ever known—tens-of-millions of American hunters who are nearly all ex-military soldiers with combat experience, and are not only heavily armed, but would take to the streets of their nation in an instant if called upon to do so by President Trump to save the their nation. 
For anyone of you believing this couldn’t possibly happen, you couldn’t be more wrong—and America’s own history proves it.
There’s a hidden reason, you see, for Trump having called forth to the American publics memory the names of two of his nations top generals, Douglas Macarthur and George Patton —for it was these two generals who fought back against the forces of the Communist led Bonus Army, in 1932, whose ultimate goal was to overthrow the US government.
Also, barely a year after General Macarthur and General Patton (along with future US President Dwight Eisenhower) defeated the Communist led Bonus Army, the American Republic was saved again, in 1933, by that nation’s greatest general, Smedley Butler, who during the Business Plot foiled the elites master plan to overthrow the government and join the United States with Nazi Germany.
Generals Macarthur, Patton, Smedley and Eisenhower, of course, were able to save the American Republic and the “billionaire blue collar” President of those times Franklin Roosevelt from the Business Plot coup—and in saving this leader they then went on to defeat Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire in World War II.
But, let me give you some hope, and a warning too—these forces seeking to destroy America and President-elect Donald Trump (and as history has proven) CAN be defeated—but this can only be accomplished if YOU START ACTING NOW!
Truth and information are the ONLY ways to defeat these monsters, and if you stop supporting the truth everything is going to be lost—not only for America, but the whole world. 
So, is it really too much to ask that you support those of us telling you the truth instead of those who do nothing but lie and deceive you?
Are you aware that if each and every one of you reading this gave, right now, just $20 we could survive for an entire year?
If the truth isn’t worth a single US 5 cent piece (nickel) a day what is? 
And most importantly, never forget that our mission is meant to accomplish one thing and one thing only—keeping this war from reaching your doorstep—and it’s nearing, much nearer, than you think!
Those of us on the front lines need your support NOW—please don’t ignore our pleas, all of our fates now hang in the balance.     
Have great peace with God,  
Sister Ciara
DublinIreland
11 November 2016



Our needs today are dire indeed, but, if every one of you reading this gave just $20.00 today, our budget for the entire year would be met!  So, before you click away, ask yourself this simple question….if your knowing the truth about what is happening now, and what will be happening in the future isn’t worth 5 US pennies a day what is?   
           
(Please note that those who respond to this appeal, in any amount, will receive, at no charge, Sorcha Faal’s  November 2016/December, 2016 lecture series to the Sisters of the Order titled “Total War: the Collapse of the United States and the Rise of Chaos: Part 58”.  This is another one of the Sorcha Faal’s most important lectures dealing with the coming timelines of war, famine, catastrophic Earth changes and disease as predicted by ancient prophecies.)

Tuesday, November 8, 2016

HEAR US LORD

Subject: Prayer 
IN GOD WE TRUST
 
 
A "prayer chain" is a request to pass the article on to friends/family....(at least one other person) so as to NOT break chain. 
 
It will travel many, many miles around the country, maybe the world, depending on who sends it to "wherever"...
 
Please take a moment to do this and not break the chain on this important prayer...
 
After reading this prayer, please be sure to THANK GOD for listening and trust in HIS WILL to be done.
 
Dear Beloved God in Heaven,
 
Please give us a President that loves this country and everything it stands for.
 
Please give us a President who respects you as the one true God.
 
Please give us a President who will, with your help, restore this nation to its former glory, the way you created her.
 
Please give us a President that will not try to destroy our Churches and Biblical Truths.
 
Please give us a President who will honor the Constitution of the United States of America!
 
Please help us to respect what you have given to us and not take anything for granted....ever again.
 
Please God, weaken the evil and strengthen the good, both within and without.  May our eyes be opened.
 
In Jesus name, Amen.
 
As never before in the history of this country has this plea been so urgent & necessary...
 
In God We Trust and we pray that GOD WILL BLESS AMERICA once again!
 

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Will This Election Lead to an Insurrection?

Monday, October 31, 2016

Will This Election Lead to an Insurrection?



Joint  Chiefs  General:  Will  This  Election  Lead  to  an  Insurrection?






“Thank you for joining me in honoring our history, our traditions, and the institutions of the U.S. Armed Forces by upholding the principle of political neutrality.” 


With these words General Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (principal military advisor to the President of the United States) entered an unprecedented pre-election blog posted on October 24, 2016.

His thanks may be premature.  Here are the words he opened with:

“…as our country again prepares for a peaceful transfer of power to a new administration…”

What’s going on here?  Why is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs talking about a peaceful transfer of power?  When in the last 150 years have we not had a peaceful transfer of power?  Does he think there might not be a peaceful transfer of power?

Maybe the General is worried that our military will not tolerate an election stolen by Hillary Clinton.  Or the people will not tolerate it.  Here are some additional excerpts from his post.  He reminds our forces:

“Every service member swears “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States” and to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”  (Italics in original)
He then goes on
“… we must recognize that we have one Commander in Chief, and until authority is transferred on January 20, 2017, the Joint Force must remain clearly focused on and responsive to the existing National Command Authority.”
“What we must collectively guard against is allowing our institution to become politicized, or even perceived as being politicized, by how we conduct ourselves during engagements with the media, the public, or in open or social forums.”
“To that end, I have a duty to protect the integrity and political neutrality of our military profession.”
We must have “a peaceful transfer of power,” and “one Commander in Chief until authority is transferred.”  We must be “responsive to the existing National Command Authority.”  We must maintain “political neutrality.”   All in all this sounds to me like he’s pleading with the military to not revolt at the outcome of the upcoming presidential election, or to join an insurrection in progress.

This is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs!

If this is his concern, reminding the troops that: “Every service member swears “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States” is poor salesmanship, and a tactical error.

The Constitution prohibits a lying, thieving, traitor becoming President. (Peace.  I’m not going to put you through the Wikileaks emails, the Project Veritas videos, nor the trail of the dead)

The General’s real worry is, or should be, that the troops will remember their oath to defend the Constitution.  This would leave the General and his boss out twisting in the wind.

Even in these days of decline there is a danger that some people may honor their oaths. Here are the oaths concerned:

The Oath of Enlistment (for enlistees):
“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

The Oath of Office (for officers):
“I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.”

These oaths are nothing but bad news for would-be election thieves, especially traitorous ones.  Not only are enemies both foreign and domestic to be guarded against, but God is invoked to support fulfilling the oath.  
You will notice that these oaths say nothing about “preserving the political neutrality of the Armed Forces.”  

This is a tradition, and a good one – up to a point.  But if Hillary Clinton attempts to take the office of President, the point will have been passed.  It will be time to execute the prime directive and defend the Constitution.  (I wonder if the FBI reopening the Clinton email investigation is a ploy to freeze the military for now.)

The US Uniform Code of Military Justice requires that illegal orders be disobeyed.  This principle was established internationally at the Nuremberg Trials where “I was only following orders” was not accepted as a defense for NAZI war criminals.

At the beginning of his second term Obama purged the Armed Forces of officers he was able to identify as being unwilling to fire on American citizens.  (see SARTRE, iPatriot, 8/8/16)  They were removed for a time such as this.  But there may be closet patriot officers still in the military (as Obama and the General obviously believe.  When it comes right down to it, even General Dunford may be other than we assume; he did remind the troops of their oath to defend the Constitution.)

But the real danger to Clinton and Obama and their entire cabal is with the enlisted men and women.  Obama has treated them like dirt at every opportunity.  Just from personal conversations, I believe that many or most of them realize what’s going on; the destruction of the United States military and the nation.  With leadership, they may not allow this to happen.  

Would they fire on their countrymen to make horrible Hillary Clinton their Commander in Chief?  Some, yes; most, I doubt it. I believe there are many people that a Clinton victory would leave in the same psychological condition as the resisters at Bundy ranch:  there is no place left to back up. It’s resist or perish.  Listen to the people at any Trump rally.  A Clinton presidency will not be accepted.

The military intervening to thwart a blatantly illegal election outcome need not result in an actual conflict.  Just strongly suggesting a revote under honest supervision would hopefully solve the problem.
Unless of course Obama calls for UN back-up. There are treaty provisions for doing this (see Military Times 5/11/16 – which are also there for a time such as this) in which case there will be big trouble. 

Good men did not stand down in Benghazi.  I cannot believe the entire US military would comply with another order to stand down in the face of UN “peacekeepers.”

As a Christian I pray for an honest election (if Hillary makes it to election) and peace.  But we should be prepared for the opposite; a scary thought made all the more real by General Dunford’s blog.

http://ipatriot.com/will-election-lead-insurrection/ 

Friday, October 28, 2016

EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW THIS

Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton's private email server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here's what it says:

“(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

Shouldn't voters know that? The media won't tell them. So it's up to us. I DID MY PART......NOW DO  YOURS!!!!

Monday, August 15, 2016

ONE MORE REASON FOR A TWENTY SIXTH AMENDMENT!

Subject: Fw: Fwd: Age 76 - ......WE'RE SCREWED
 
The twenty sixth amendment being an amendment to the Constitution that would make
it illegal for congress to exempt themselves from any legislation.
 




Forwarded as requested
 Age 76 - ......WE'RE SCREWED
 
IMPORTANT ACTION INFORMATION FOR NOVEMBER, 2016, VOTE
Medicare at age 76!
If you don't read this, and do nothing about it, don't complain when it affects you or your loved ones!  This is the second Judge to have read the Obama Care document comments.  More highlights of Nancy's "pass it and then find out what's in the bill"!  Show this to everyone nearing the ripe old age of 76.  These are just a few of the things that we Seniors are going to have to deal with which started in 2014.  Even far left Democrats will not like these.

MEDICARE AT AGE 76, IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - ANYONE WHO DOUBTS THIS IS TRUE CAN DOWNLOAD THE NEW OBAMA CARE AND LOOK UP THE PAGES MENTIONED.  THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING....................T HIS should be read by everyone, especially important to those over 75....... If you are younger, then it may apply to your parents.
Your hospital Medicare admittance has just changed under Obama Care.
You must be admitted by your primary Physician in order for Medicare to pay for it!  If you are admitted by an emergency room doctor, it is treated as outpatient care where hospital costs are not covered.  This is only the tip of the iceberg for Obama Care.  Just wait to see what else went into effect in 2014.
YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS... At age 76 when you most need it most, you are not eligible for cancer treatment * see page 272.  What Nancy Pelosi didn't want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed.  Remember she said, "We have to pass the Bill so that we can see what's in it."  Well, here it is.
Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number THE CARE BILL HB 3200 JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL.
Judge KITHIL of Marble Falls, TX - highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200.  Please read this....... especially the reference to pages 58 & 59.  JUDGE KITHIL wrote:
Page 50/section 152:  The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents,
even if they are here illegally.
Page 58 and 59:  
The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.
Page 65/section 164:  The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN)
Page 203/line 14-15:  
The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax.  (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)
Page 241 and 253:  Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.
This is what they do in Sweden too.  I know because Alf's daughter Ann is an OBGYN, and her husband, Thorsten, is a surgeon.........
Page 272. section 1145:  
Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.
Page 317 and 321:  The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.
Page 425, line 4-12:  
The government mandates advance-care planning consultations.  Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years.(Death counseling.)
Page 429, line 13-25:  
The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.

HAD ENOUGH????  Judge Kithil then goes on to identify:  "Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress.
No wonder they did not see the need to read it....doesn't apply to them!!! THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO STAND UP TO WASHINGTON .....
I don't know if we can do anything, but awareness helps.

Winds Of Change  --  Warren Buffet is asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
At least 20 if you can
.  It has to stop somewhere.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have this message.  This is one idea that really should be passed around
 

Saturday, August 6, 2016

VERY POLITICALLY INCORRECT!

ery Politically Incorrect
 
cid:image001.jpg@01D1DB64.93406AE0

cid:image002.jpg@01D1DB64.93406AE0

cid:image003.jpg@01D1DB64.93406AE0

cid:image004.jpg@01D1DB64.93406AE0


cid:image005.jpg@01D1DB64.93406AE0


Whoever thought that the words

“Politically Incorrect” and “Appropriate” would come to mind at the same time?


Thursday, July 7, 2016

The FBI Won’t Charge Hillary Clinton, So Edward Snowden Did This…

The FBI Won’t Charge Hillary Clinton, So Edward Snowden Did This…: Snowden was exiled for breaking classification rules but Clinton was pardoned. Where's the justice?

ALL VETERANS DO THE SAME!


 
 

 
 
 
Today Alex went to the DMV to renew his license.  
 

When he was told to go have his picture taken he noticed that there were some men having their picture taken, these men were wearing turbins on there heads. 
 
Alex was asked to take his hat off to have his picture taken.    He said "no", and "no" again when asked the second time.    When he was asked why he would not remove his hat he said, "those men didn't remove their head wear, I shouldn't either". 
 
It was explained that this was their attire and their religion.    Alex told the DMV person that what he had on was his attire and when he entered the Marines he declared an oath to the USA, and one nation under God, so that his oath was under God .. so just as good as his religion.    Well, the DMV people didn't know what to do, they spoke to supervisors and called Sacramento.   Alex was told, after an hour, that he could wear his hat for the picture and if there were any problems they would let him know and he could appeal their decision. 
 
He told them if there was a problem he WILL appeal it.    Alex feels no one has more right to display their head gear then a Veteran or active service person. 
When he left several employees at the DMV clapped quietly for him.    He has spoken to few other Veterans and they plan to do the same.

ALL VETERANS SHOULD DO THE SAME!! Time to start taking our country back from the liberal idiots bent on its destruction!

PASS IT ON TO ALL YOUR VETERAN FRIENDS!!

I LIKE THIS GUY A LOT!! A REAL AMERICAN!!! 
 
 
 
Tammo Wilkens

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

REALLY, ARE WE REALLY THIS STUPID ?


Hillary walks on email scandal
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, Exit From The Matrixclick here.)
Hillary, email free pass, Benghazi
 
By Jon Rappoport
 
Little-known fact: Hillary Clinton is a Quantum Physics genius with a specialty in Time Manipulation.
 
We'll get to that in a minute. But first, FBI Director Comey's absurd exoneration of Hillary in the email scandal. The law states, of course, that gross negligence in handling and transmitting classified materials is enough to warrant prosecution for a crime, and it can carry up to ten years in prison. (Federal Penal Code, Title 18, section 793[f].) The quality of the intent behind the negligence has nothing to do with the law. Good intent, bad intent, neutral intent. All irrelevant. Comey knows that.
 
His statement about the diligent and exceptional investigation by his people at the Bureau is fluff and window dressing. It all came down to his recommendation to his boss, the Attorney General. And there Comey revealed his own intent:
 
Hillary is too big to fail.
 
She was grossly negligent. The FBI confirmed that.  
 
But Comey said that because Hillary showed no intent to cause harm, she should walk. Baloney. Again, intent is irrelevant, according to the law, which states:
 
"Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer---Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both." (Title 18, section 793[f], Federal Penal Code)
 
That section of the law was written to cover gross negligence. It's the only standard. Period. Got it? That section of the law was written for the express purpose of setting aside the question of intent behind the negligence---so that intent couldn't be used as an excuse for not prosecuting.
This whole stage play is a backwards farce. First of all, the decision about whether to prosecute is, guess what, at the discretion of the Attorney General, not the FBI. Who cares what the FBI recommends? Especially in public, in front of television cameras.
 
Does a city DA automatically mirror the cops' recommendations when he makes up his mind about prosecuting a suspect? No. The cops hand over their evidence, and the DA makes his call. Take the case to court or not.
 
Attorney General Lynch's statement, a few days ago, about following the FBI's recommendation is ridiculous. It's like saying, "They're doing my job for me. I'm not here. I'm a non-entity."
 
The fix is obviously in. The players in the farce (Lynch and Comey) performed their roles so badly they should have been doing dinner theater in Florida. Maybe the half-awake senior citizens would have bought their act.
 
"Hi folks, I'm Jim Comey, FBI Director. We found a ton of gross negligence in the Hillary case, but we decided not to prosecute. It's not our job to decide that one way or the other, but we thought we would decide anyway. We're as honest as the day is long."
 
"Hi folks, I'm Loretta Lynch, Attorney General. I spoke with Bill Clinton the other today at the airport, and the family's fine. Everybody's fine. I'm supposed to decide, ha-ha, whether to prosecute criminals, but in this case, I'm letting the FBI decide. You want to know why? Because if Comey laid out his ton of gross negligence and then said it was up to me, everybody would have realized I should prosecute her. So we let Comey act as cop and prosecutor. You know, so we could get the whole thing over with, in a few minutes."
 
Comey lays out the evidence, which is a slam-dunk for prosecution, then publicly recommends no prosecution, while at the same time he interprets federal law. And he interprets it as falsely as possible. I guess he's an appellate judge, too. Cop, prosecutor, judge. Triple play.
 
Why didn't they just cart out a giant Disney character to announce Hillary was free? Goofy or Pluto.
 
So now let's move on to Hillary herself, and her career of getting away with everything under the sun.  
 
---Recall her Benghazi testimony before Congress? She said, at this point, what difference does it make?
 
It's not just that she brushed off the whole thing, it's the time scale. It's as if, in her mind, she was being grilled a few decades after Benghazi happened. She's saying, it's history, why should we revisit it?
 
She was on to so many other things, she couldn't be bothered to look back on what was, for her, a dead issue, something a historian might decide to write about. Benghazi was way, way back there. A dim memory that couldn't possibly have any meaning left in it. Why should we talk about the Trojan War here today, in front of an investigating committee? I have other things to worry about. My upcoming campaign for the Presidency. My husband, because he can always cause trouble for us. My advisors, who could screw up. You never know. But Benghazi? Nothing. If I had anything to do with it, you'll never prove a connection. Let's not sit around kidding ourselves. You know and I know nothing is going to come of this. What difference does it make at this point? People don't understand my psychology. I'm two steps into the future at all times. When something is done, it's done, and since I'll never pay for any hypothetical crimes, who cares? It's just public masturbation on the part of my enemies. They've been after me for a long time. They'll never catch me. We invaded Libya and we won. We destroyed the country.
 
And now she says: The email scandal? My God, that's such old news. Are we still on that subject? Can't you people find something else to talk about? That's settled. It's filed under "unintentional mistakes may have been made but there were no adverse consequences." It's as distant a memory as Monica and Bill, and Bill and his women. Whether I defended him as a loyal wife and a put-upon victim, or whether I actively punished those women; it's simply another imponderable, and historians will take it up and hash it over one day when I'm long gone. Who cares? What difference does it make at this point? The same is true of the Clinton Foundation. Whether our donors were granted favors is simply a matter of speculation, and therefore it has no force, no power as an issue. The mere coincidence or correlation of money and favors adds up to an unprovable hypothesis. Isn't it obvious? There is no smoking gun. There will never be a smoking gun, so let's put that one to rest, too. As a piece of imponderable history. What else do you have? My support, at one point, for the invasion of Iraq? Another ancient war. It happened. It's over. Iraq now presents a new set of problems. Let's deal with those. Wall Street money? Pharmaceutical money? Do you want to dig into that? All I have to say is that I will never allow campaign contributions to influence my judgment. You people just don't understand the concept of time. Once a thing is done, it's in the past. It could be five minutes ago or a century, but you can never bring it back. What difference does it make? I'm looking ahead to the Convention. And with my nomination in tow, I'll launch a very active campaign against my opponent, Mr. Trump. I'm quite confident I'll win the election, and when I'm the next President, everything I've ever done will truly be erased, because the American people will have decided it makes no difference. The people and I will concur on that point.
 
What difference does anything make? As President, when I issue a decision, it's done. We're on to the next piece of business. I'm the person I am tomorrow. I'm never the person I am today or was yesterday. The way time passes, how quickly it moves, depends on the point of viewer of the observer. Well, my point of view is constantly refreshing itself. I share this trait with people like Bill Gates and George Soros. They invest in the future. The act of putting money to work now is irrelevant. It only matters what happens to that money tomorrow. Space and time are relative, and my process dictates that my actions only have meaning when we see their consequences---by which time I'm already engaged in more important actions, so what difference does it make how the past turned out? The future already exists in an ideal form, and in the future I'm already President. Can't you people see that? All you have to do is see it and admit it. Then things will take care of themselves. When you do see it, you'll understand that whatever we're talking about now makes no difference. Consider Mr. Trump's slogan, Make America Great Again. Again? He wants to reinstate the past. But the past is gone. From my perspective, the past never was. The issues we argue about with reference to the Constitution are misguided. What Constitution? I go farther than claiming it is a living document. How could it exist now when it was purportedly framed in some purportedly ancient period? We fool ourselves when we search for what it was. We write what we write and say what we say and do what we do and legislate what we legislate in the ever-changing now, which is the future. Therefore, if we say there is a Constitution which is being updated, what we really mean is we're inventing it out of whole cloth as we move along. Like money or debt, we're inventing it out of thin air. So what difference does it make? Likewise, what difference does it make what I will do during my Presidency? I will always be out ahead of that. I hope this statement is clear to the Committee and, therefore, we can terminate this proceeding. You're following along behind me, and I'm leading you. How else could it be?
 
What difference, at this point, does it make?
 
What possible difference?
 
So, Mr. Chairman, I feel better, now that I've gotten that off my chest. I feel refreshed. I've clarified how things stand, and how the universe of time and space works. I'm in the future, and all of you are in the past. I already know what you couldn't know. Naturally, therefore, you'll look to me for guidance. It's logical, and if there's one thing I stand for, it's logic. I believe we're done here.
 
Well, you're done. I'm just getting started.
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.